|
Maasai and Their Cattle
Tall and strong, the men carrying spears and the
women draped in brilliant red cloth, the women bedecked
in beaded jewelry, the Maasai people symbolize for many
the fierce beauty and independence of Africa. They are,
by tradition, semi-nomadic warriors and pastoralists
whose meanderings through East Africa, and whose strictly
animal diet, have depended on their herds.
Their foundation myth proclaims that all
cattle originally belonged to the Maasai. This, they
believed, entitled them to "reclaim" cattle
from other tribes. Cattle raiding gave the Maasai a
warlike reputation throughout Kenya and Tanzania, where
they maintained a dominant position for nearly 200 years.
According to Swedish anthropologist Kaj Arhem, "Their
dietary ideal excludes, and their entire culture strongly
devaluates, all plant food and game meat."
Yet now, because of pressures from weather,
conservation managers, and influences from the outside
world, the pastoral Maasai are slowly becoming agriculturalists.
By tradition, they have lived on cow's milk and the
meat of goats and sheep. When food is scarce, they also
drink the blood of cattle by opening a neck vein in
a way that causes no lasting harm to the animal. This
practice appalls most Westerners. But because cattle
signify wealth, they are seldom eaten. The Maasai reserve
beef for rare ceremonies like the initiation rites of
young warriors.
Maasai herds have shrunken in recent years
as a result of drought and disease. Many households
have fewer than 10 head of cattle, which is considered
to be the level of subsistence. To survive, the Maasai
must supplement their traditional animal diet with grain.
The shift from pastoral to agricultural life is profound.
The Maasai can grow grain, which ties them down, or
they can buy it, which monetizes their barter economy.
Arhem notes that when food is scarce, especially during
the dry season, pastoralists tend to sell their cattle
to buy grain.
Maasai Access to the NCA (Ngorongoro
Conservation Area)
In 1959, an ordinance was passed in Tanzania (called
Tanganyika at the time) that split the great Serengeti
National Park into two. The southern part became the
Ngorongoro Conservation Area, a 3,200-square-mile cornucopia
of wildlife and varied terrain. Although small in area,
the NCA nurtures an abundance of species from the fertile
bottom of the Ngorongoro
Crater to the Highlands where, at an altitude of
about 7,000 - 10,000 feet, rainfall is usually plentiful
and both forests and grasslands thrive. The NCA includes
Olduvai Gorge, where the Leakeys discovered the earliest
known remains of hominids
Within the NCA live 40,000 indigenous
people. Most are Maasai. In addition, 150,000 cattle,
sheep and goats graze the NCA, according to a 1996 census.
During the dry season from approximately June to November,
the Maasai live in permanent settlements in the Ngorongoro
Highlands. When the seasonal rains begin, they descend
with their cattle to short-grass plains and move from
one temporary camp to another.
Planning and Agriculture
A 1975 law charges the Ngorongoro Conservation Area
Authority (NCAA), an appointed body, to conserve wildlife
and "to safeguard and promote the interests of
Maasai citizens engaged in cattle ranching and dairy
industry within the conservation area." The NCAA
is unusual because it has a dual responsibility to conserve
wildlife and promote "the human development of
resident pastoralists." The Authority does, in
fact, allow the Maasai to keep cattle on the Highlands.
But the lush Ngorongoro Crater bottom, where the Maasai
lived for two centuries, is off bounds to them for cultivation
and, intermittently, for both habitation and grazing.
Recently, they are allowed to graze their livestock
within the Crater only with permission from the NCAA.
Therein lies the dilemma. The Crater is
reserved for a rich concentration of wildlife including
thousands of wildebeest, zebra and gazelle, predators
such as lions and cheetahs, and flamingos, elephants,
and some of the last black rhinos in East Africa. But
the Maasai have also been part of the ecology for many
years. As presented by Arhem, tension arises between
the NCAA, which frequently finds the Maasai to be obstacles
to wildlife conservation, and the needs of the Maasai,
whose newly emerging need for agriculture was not part
of the original plan.
The Authority and its enabling legislation
conceived of the Maasai solely as pastoralists and did
not allow for the possibility that they would need to
consume 40% of their food in the form of grain.
When Maasai elders signed a written agreement
to vacate the Serengeti in the late 1950s, they were
promised "rights of habitation, cultivation and
socio-economic development" in the NCA. They did
not get them, nor did they receive promised water projects
for herds in the Highlands and drugs to keep cattle
healthy. In some years, the NCAA has returned major
parts of its community development funding unspent.
The Authority has also been criticized for adopting
policies without giving the Maasai a meaningful role
in shaping them.
To learn and record what the Maasai had
to say about sweeping changes to their rights of access,
an international group know as the Forest, Trees and
People Programme, formed by the UN Food and Agriculture
Organization and the Swedish University of Agricultural
Sciences, videotaped their comments during public meetings
held in November, 1995. Charles Lane published the results
in a highly controversial paper titled "Ngorongoro
Voices." A sample of their testimony:
None of us today has enough cows to
depend on. Only a quarter of us could really be called
pastoralists." (Olendooki Raphael)
The [NCAA] took our voices and our words
and pictures. We are given this document [the management
plan], but we can't tell what's in it. The only thing
I can understand is my own photograph." (Sikai
ole Sereb)
Even the NCAA hasn't helped us. If you
look way back [in history], our livestock problems
were less severe [than now.]" (Warrior, Endulen)
Some of us have been killed by these
animals, eaten by lions, but when this happens the
animal cannot be killed because it is valued more
than us. (ole Moinga Olonyokie, Endulen)
Just look around. The parts of the world
left with wildlife are peopled by pastoralists. Why
is it so? How is it that supposed "experts"
and "guardians of nature" come here after
having ruined trees and wildlife in their places of
origin? (Shinana ole Moinga, Endulen)
The NCAA argues that the Maasai and
their herds overtax the carrying capacity of available
land. Outside observers like Lane and Arhem urge the
NCAA to recognize the Massai's expertise as resource
managers and to support their pastoral traditions while
accommodating their need for supplementary food as non-invasively
as possible. A future newsletter will present the NCAA's
response to the Maasai's concerns and a closer look
at the results of the Authority's wildlife conservation
efforts within the Ngorongoro Conservation Area.
|